Saturday, August 22, 2020
The Problem of Symbol in Philosophy :: Symbolism Religion Essays
The Problem of Symbol in Philosophy missing works refered to The man of the world is inseparable from the perspective of the cognizance. The classes of existence are arranged outside his psyche, out of the restrictions of his still, small voice. The drifter all over the place is a supernatural legend; going along the scene of thought, he moves totally openly, despite the national or worldly structures it (that is, the idea) takes. For all these are living structures, and the voyager is supernaturally alive. In this way - Mamardashvilli and Montaigne, and Pascal, and Descartes, and Rousseau. Also, Proust, at last.... Listening mindfully to The Lectures about Proust, we discover the discussion of the copies and can't recognize the eyewitness and the model. In the last layers of the French epic there gleams the brain of the Georgian rationalist. The possibility of the craftsman (as to the possibility of the craftsman) emerges in the spirit of the mastermind. The scholarly impression is inconceivable without the otherworldly inclination, without the inward disaster of the soul. The soul is comprehended as a rule of restoring of the spirit, its coming into contact with the mystery of the presence. The soul is the one of a kind and perfect substance, the target establishment of the ontos that we make due at the most noteworthy purpose of the idea or enthusiasm. I am a reasoning thing... It is something questioning, understanding, declaring, denying, willing, reluctant and having creative mind and emotions. The extraordinary dualist Descartes! You were the just one to comprehend the unity of the being. The presence is an emotional encounter of the truth of implications, so the substance and the presence (yet not the being) are on the contrary posts of the all inclusive, similar to two pointed parts of the bargains, which one can neither seize, nor break. Between them there lies the perfect vastness of unique expectations; they are theoretical as in not a discerning item, clear with no words, restricts it, yet simply the soul, the minor thought. In any case the demise. We can't feel it, however we can represent it. Put it into shape by methods for the purposeful development. The image emerges there and afterward, where and when the presence and the soul blend in one and only point. The substance and its life are not broken into classifications. They (that is, the substance and life) break the scholarly structures, keeping the keenness, which is fit to exist outside any plans, definitions and even clarifications.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.